Lynne Twinn wrote: > I probably should have made it clear who I was replying to in my last post, > although I presumed it was clear enough. > I was replying to *Day*,in which there was a reference to the lad who jumped > from the bridge.I still dont think it can be likened to louts throwing > concrete from it, but I am sure that that wasn't what he (she) intended it > to sound like, although it came across like that.? > Apologies to *wifey* anyway. Apologies I certainly didn't mean my message to sound like this. Re-reading my response I can see why it looks as though I'm drawing a comparison. I can only offer the excuse that I rushed off a reply before thinking or checking for tactfulness. I had simply searched the Cambridge News site for other incidents involving the bridge, as wifey had mentioned that the slab incident was not the first, and that was the first story I came across. As usual, the newspaper only reports the original incident and there is no mention of how he is doing now. Of course I hope he is better. -- Day (Mr)